ALT.SF4M Amusements 8/97 • j********o@***.com 16/08/1997 00:00:000 UTC Just to break the monotony - another satisfactory issue of SciFi Age, _except_ for a lackluster effort at self-plagarization by Greg Benford! This guy is really queer for the Galactic Center, for beejezus's sake! Whole passages from his series about the same are reproduced in "Galaxis." Pleh! But, the issue is redeemed by one very good story, a good one, and an acceptable one. Especially cool Daria episode, "The Misery Chick" - some conflict arises between the buddies. "The Big House" was also especially funny. Gorno "If women ran the world, do you think rockets would be shaped the same?" "Probably, but they'd be much larger." • j********o@***.com 17/08/1997 00:00:000 UTC Bloom's Closing of the American Mind serves as a survey of philosophical thought and reading it has gotten me interested in philosophy again. Something that occurs to me is that Ayn Rand is an inheritor of Nietzsche. While the latter was a serious scholar (if, like her, a temporal failure and generally pathetic human being whose ideas were bad for humanity, and a victim of his own romantic and intrinsically self-contradictory anti-rationist philosophy), her ideas are a reactionary spin on his own. To whit: Nietzsche betrays the premise of classical philosophy, that is, the rational search for the objective Good, by proposing a strictly subjective world, and embraces the poet, traditional competitor to the philosopher, as creator of the myths which philosophy sought to penetrate and escape. His Superman is the creator of myths, and cultures - a Moses who himself carves the Ten Commandments and promulgates them by his own force of will; the Athenian who excavates Socrates' benighted cave, only within which, says Nietzsche, can man be content. Rand seems to marry the two - her Superman, however, is he that sees through the myths of society and recognizes an objective esthetic order which he pursues; he carries the indifference of the philosopher to the culture around him to an amoral indifference towards the people around him. He does not wish to impose a moral order for any supposed public benefit, he merely seeks to create the beautiful for his own satisfaction, and that of others gifted with true vision. Both bad ideas. Me, I'm with Kant - put your irresolveable contradictions in different corners, don't mix them together. Gorno