ALT.SF4M B5 Virgin and loving it. • Thomas C. Wilson, Jr. 08/01/1998 00:00:000 UTC I never watched B5 regularly until the current TNT fest. I don't know exactly why but I guess Real Life (tm) kept me fron noticing until it was well underway. When I did tune in, I just couldn't grok - most episodes seemed to have 10 continuing plot threads of 5 minutes each - kewl if you have been following the script, totally dense if you've just jumped in. Watching from the beginning has let me start at the shallow end of the pool. I've enjoyed the revival enough to make a point of time shift taping the episodes so I can really watch them after the kids are in bed. They do like B5 but it interferes with Rugrats at 7:30 and I have to be a bit careful to screen for naughty bits (like 65% of scenes with Londo :-) and/or violence inappropriate for 8 and 5 year olds. Sean and I both think the computer graphics animations are really neat - good enough for suspension of disbelief without sucking all the resources out of the plotline. The worst thing in the world is watching SF when they spend megabucks on FX and $4.95 on the screenplay (Best example from 97 - "Something has survived - unfortunately it wasn't the entertainment value"). I'm also interested in what hardware was used to generate the CGA - they are really excellent particularly considering the technology available 4 or 5 years ago when the first episodes were produced. As for the B5 pilot being "bad", compare it with the first few episodes of ST:TNG - they are actually painful to watch. Jonathan Frakes' eye shadow alone - Rocky Horror meets Starfleet. EEEEEEWWWWWW! It also reminds us why one of the first big Usenet newsgroups was alt.wesley.crusher.die.die.die. Tom -- Thomas C. Wilson / Ocean Instrument Lab / Marine Sciences State University of New York / Stony Brook NY 11794-5000 USA Tel: 516-632-8706/FAX: 516-632-8820/T******n@N***********.******b.edu "Opinions expressed are not necessarily, etc. etc...." To reply, remove NOSPAM from email address (this is done to foil automatic bulk email address extractors) • Thomas C. Wilson, Jr. 09/01/1998 00:00:000 UTC Forumite wrote: > Using "Virgin" ihn te subject line may get you unexpected emailings considering > what else gets posted ;-) > Jerry Katz ...but they won't be from anyone who was in the Forum from 1978 to 1983. Ahhh-henh! Tom P.S. Anyone else here ever hear of a "Langdon diagram"? -- Thomas C. Wilson / Ocean Instrument Lab / Marine Sciences State University of New York / Stony Brook NY 11794-5000 USA Tel: 516-632-8706/FAX: 516-632-8820/T******n@N***********.******b.edu "Opinions expressed are not necessarily, etc. etc...." To reply, remove NOSPAM from email address (this is done to foil automatic bulk email address extractors) • f*******e@***.com 08/01/1998 00:00:000 UTC Using "Virgin" ihn te subject line may get you unexpected emailings considering what else gets posted ;-) Jerry Katz • b********r@p*******e.com 09/01/1998 00:00:000 UTC "Thomas C. Wilson, Jr." wrote: >Sean and I both think the computer graphics animations are really neat - >good enough for suspension of disbelief without sucking all the >resources out of the plotline. The worst thing in the world is watching >SF when they spend megabucks on FX and $4.95 on the screenplay (Best >example from 97 - "Something has survived - unfortunately it wasn't the >entertainment value"). I'm also interested in what hardware was used to >generate the CGA - they are really excellent particularly considering >the technology available 4 or 5 years ago when the first episodes were >produced. Originally, they were using Amigas and a Video Toaster, but now they've switched over to pc's (still using the Video Toaster AFAICT). BTW, J. Michael Straczynski is going to be our "Special Guest" at BucCONeer... Perrianne Lurie BucCONeer, the 56-th World Science Fiction Convention August 5-9, 1998, Baltimore, Maryland, USA P.O. Box 314, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 b********r@b********.********n.org http://www.bucconeer.worldcon.org Personal E-mail: b********r@p*******e.com