ALT.SF4M Well! • Gary McCammon 19/11/1999 00:00:000 UTC Well, yee-farggin'-ha, nothing here except real posts. Has the horde of horny losers finally got the message that nobody's interested? Hm. Anything new going on in the world? Anyone read anything cool? (Other than Stefan's review of the new Gibson -- didn't even know he had anything new out. Yowza.) Anyone got any leads on Mark'n'Lethe? (I want my damn MST3K episodes back!) South Carolina doesn't suck as much as I thought. Kinda bereft of culture, but nowhere near the rebo-saturated redneck hell I was afraid it'd be. Now if I could only find a decent used bookstore and a all-night diner, I'd be happy. --Tog (y'all) • p*******x@****.com 21/11/1999 00:00:000 UTC One day in Teletubbyland, j********o@***.com (JohnGorno) said: >on year-old posts in the E:FC group now that the series is decent again. Also, E:FC? -- 73 de Dave Weingart KA2ESK O, what can ail thee, geek-at-arms mailto:p*******x@****.com Alone and slowly telnetting? http://www.liii.com/~phydeaux The net has crumbled from the load And no hosts ping • s******j@f****.**o.com 22/11/1999 00:00:000 UTC On 21 Nov 1999 03:33:53 GMT, Dave Weingart wrote: >One day in Teletubbyland, j********o@***.com (JohnGorno) said:   >>on year-old posts in the E:FC group now that the series is decent again. >E:FC? Probably "Earth: Final Conflict." Sometimes-interesting sci-fi thing derived from something Roddenberry wrote on the back of a cocktail napkin, or mumbled in his sleep. I could be wrong, but I think they're in "make this up as we go along; they'll still think it's profound if we make the music swell when we reveal things" mode. I'm losing patience fast. The Stargate spinoff seems decent. -- +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ SeJ@ay-oh-el-dot-com ~ stefanj@eye-oh-dot-com http://www.io.com/~stefanj/ CHARGES APPLIED FOR UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL! • Thom 23/11/1999 00:00:000 UTC *Clippo* >Still working on my long post on the Zombie Problem, and dutifully catching up >on year-old posts in the E:FC group now that the series is decent again. Also, >pondering the (Relativistic) Shroedinger Wave and getting around to reading >Einstein's book on relativity. I have to observe that I hate Minkowski's >stupid "ict" convention, now that I've figured it out. Shrodinger is bad enough. A relativistic approach? Have you your own quantum number? Thom • j********o@***.com 20/11/1999 00:00:000 UTC In article <8152up$4ko$*@b****.****.***.*********k.net>, "Gary McCammon" writes: >Well, yee-farggin'-ha, nothing here except real posts. Has the horde of >horny losers finally got the message that nobody's interested? Hm. Oh, yeah, rub it in! Like you're Wilt Chamberlin! We're still here - there just hasn't been much SF to talk about lately... In point of fact, what better venue for porno advertising than a science fiction group? Gorno Still working on my long post on the Zombie Problem, and dutifully catching up on year-old posts in the E:FC group now that the series is decent again. Also, pondering the (Relativistic) Shroedinger Wave and getting around to reading Einstein's book on relativity. I have to observe that I hate Minkowski's stupid "ict" convention, now that I've figured it out.